akutek.info

The Acoustic www Conference site

There are still many topics to investigate in the field of stage acoustics. Some say it has only just begun. Paper: Stage Acoustics - Early Investigations (pdf).

A Litterature Review on stage acoustics is published in the Papers Session.

Orchestra canopies are often called for, but can they always be justified? More info on canopy research here.

Current view in akuTEK Research is that the following topics are strongly related: stage acoustics, rehearsal rooms, performer’s perception, perceived reverberation. Stage acoustics and rehearsal room acoustics are important in order to develop musicians, orchestras and provide for good playing conditions—to the benefit of the listeners—and must be supported by knowledge of performer’s perception in general, and perceived reverberance in particular.

What kind of reverberance do performers perceive? Does EDT describe  reverberance close to the instrument , where EDT approaches zero? You may judge for yourself in the reverberance sound demo. More about this in the akuTEK research section Reverberation

Can mutual hearing (=hearing others) be predicted and measured with simply an empty stage and assuming omni-directional source, as with the ST-parameters? Maybe not, since the sound transmission paths between musicians are sensitive to natural obstacles in an orchestra (persons, chairs, music stands,..) on stage, and by the uneven directionality of musical instruments.

A hearing related measure G50 is suggested (link1, link2). G50 is the level of  the initial energy integrated from 0 to 50ms, relative to direct sound energy at 10m distance from the source. Like our ears, G50 will take more than just the direct sound into account. In stage acoustics the direct sound path is a very unreliable sound transmission channel. The significance of this is to be investigated further.

A paper on this topic was presented by Magne Skålevik at ICA 2007 in Madrid: Sound transmission between musicians in a symphony orchestra on a concert hall stage (7 page paper in pdf).  Presentation: PDF-version (829kB)

Abstract:

Mutual hearing among musicians playing in an orchestra is essential for their ability to play well. The degree of mutual hearing (also referred to as "hearing others") is assumed to depend on the quality of sound transmission between from the musical instrument of one musician to the ears of a colleague musician. Further, this quality depends on several factors: The direct sound path (if not obstructed), the indirect sound paths via reflecting surfaces surrounding the orchestra, and the sound travelling through the orchestra in complex ways. Moreover, the quality of the sound that radiates from an instrument in the directions of the various paths varies with time and frequency due to properties of the instruments, the way they are played, and the music itself. This paper presents results from MLS-measurements of transmission through a symphony orchestra, and a discussion of the significance of some physical factors, e.g. seating arrangement, a canopy and of source directionality.

More research

Johan Andersson and Alf Berntson concludes as follows in this paper:

The measured sound level is probably mainly determined by the sound from the own instrument and the closest surrounding instruments. The judged level is probably based on the later arrived sound level and the character of the sound.

 

In 2005-2008, Mike Barron lead a research project on Stage Acoustics at the University of Bath (project description), assisted by PhD student JJ Dammerud.
September 2007:  
Stage conditions for orchestral performance
                                 
Paper (488kB pdf)                   Presentation  (616kB pdf)

Stage (Support) parameters ST early and ST late

Stage parameters were suggested by Gade in his pioneer work in the 1980’s (follow link to pdf-document, pages 24-43 ).

Among these, the support parameter ST (in a variety of versions) is the one that is mostly used, and it describes the energy foldback to the musicians on stage.

STearly                    The early reflected (20-100ms re direct sound) energy level relative to the initial (e.g. 0-10ms re direct sound) measured at 1.0m from an omni-directional source.

ST late                     The late reflected (arriving 100-1000ms re direct sound) energy level relative to the initial (e.g. 0-10ms re direct sound) measured at 1.0m from an omni-directional source.

The early support - denoted ST1 or STearly - is now commonly used to describe the degree of mutual hearing or hearing others. This is to be expected, since on most stages the early reflected energy is expected to contain sound from the hole ensemble as well as the musicians one instrument.

The late support describes the degree to which the musician hears the late reverberant sound. ST late is suggested as a descriptor of performers subjective reverberance, see also the akuTEK page Parameters. Singers often appreciates to hear their own voice filling the auditorium, and is expected to prefer high ST late values. ST late is almost solely determined by the ratio between RT and volume of the hall.

However, one should take the balance ST late - STearly into account, since if ST late is high compared to other halls, the late reverberant sound may still appear weak if also STearly is very high. If this balance is too low (say << -3dB) musicians may feel that the stage is acoustically decoupled from the auditorium. This may be the result when introducing a canopy that is too low and too dense.

In her Master thesis “Podium Acoustics for the Symphony Orchestra” (4MB pdf),  Cederlöf concludes that the subjective parameter which got the highest correlation with musicians’ Overall Impression is Support.

In akuTEK research the current conclusions are:

1. ST early value should be considered in relation to ST late

2. Mutual hearing conditions on a stage can not be fully measured or predicted  with an omni-directional source on an empty stage

3. While ST-parameters may describe the conditions for soloists and duets rather well, they do not take the effect of obstacles and complex directivity inside a larger ensemble into account. The significance of this is yet to evaluate

This and more is discussed in these akuTEK papers on diffusivity and directivity and canopies.

More about definitions and measurement of room acoustical parameters including stage parameters can be found:

· on akuTEK page  http://www.akutek.info/concert_hall_acoustics_files/parameters.htm

· on pages 9 of 10 in Room Acoustical Measurements (university pdf)

· on pages 86-89 of 107 here: link to commercial pdf (1.5MB)  including recommended values.

· Example of winMLS measurement results of stage parameters including ST1 in external link to here: link to commercial HTML

 

Stage Acoustics, support and mutual hearing in ensemble

Stage Acoustics